“Mere Fiction”
On page 70 in The Art of War For Writers there’s a discussion about Herman Melville’s outlook when he wrote Moby Dick and Stephen King’s when he created ‘Salem’s Lot. They both apparently decided to “go for it.” The author says Melville was “pursuing a white whale of artistic vision.” Stephen King wrote ‘Salem’s Lot at a time when he was a 23-year-old writer and Carrie had yet to come out.
I say more power to them for pursuing the books of their hearts and their artistic visions and for not writing “mere” fiction. You may be wondering why more authors don’t do that because if they did, maybe there’d be more great books on the shelves.
It’s a bit of contradiction, isn’t it, that at writer’s conferences you will hear editors tell wanna-be writers to “write the book of your heart.” I can’t tell you how many times I’ve heard that line used. I’m old and jaded now, but there was a time when I was wide-eyed and innocent about the world of publishing and I actually believed those editors. Frankly, those editors probably meant what they said. They wanted writers to write the books of their hearts. What they didn’t say was how hard it would be to get those books published.
Want some more contradiction? How about this? “We want you to write a book of the heart. Just…you know…figure out how to make it commercially viable.”
You want to get published? The first rule is, don’t bother writing the book of your heart. Write something’s that’s commercially viable. If you manage to combine those two and do it well, congratulations. You might become a best-selling author in record time. Or…you might not.
Although I’ve never been under contract, never had a multi-book deal based on a partial or a pitch, I know authors who have. Do you know what they’re told after they sell the first one or two books and they do well enough to get another contract? Write more of the same. Do not deviate from the path. This is what sells. The publisher doesn’t care if you’re tired of writing romantic paranormals and you want to try your hand at urban fantasy. They’ve built you as a romantic paranormal author. And there you shall remain.
Let’s say you’ve sold twelve or fifteen books and maybe you’ve quit your day job. You’ve started to count on a certain level of income, whatever it may be, from your writing. You can get a contract on a partial. Why would you take a chance and write something entirely different? Something your editor isn’t interested in and you may never sell. Because it’s the book of your heart? Seriously, how many authors in this situation do you think are going to do that? How many of them have the time when they’re under contract? I can’t really answer that but I’m going to take a wild guess and say not very many.
In fact, based on my limited research, do you know when an author writes a “book of the heart?” When everything else dries up or they’re just so burnt out from writing whatever commercial trap they landed in. When their contracts go bye-bye and their sales drop and their agent no longer answers their calls. That’s when they decide to “go for it.”
The two examples of Melville and King basically prove my point. King was still an unknown with no sales track record. And Melville, actually, I don’t know where he was in his career, but wherever it was, he had no qualms (and possibly no family to support from his writing) about going for it.
Don’t take advice from me, because I’m not an example I’d recommend anyone follow. Virtually nothing I produce or had published is hugely commercial. Yet. But I’m not dependent on my mere pittance of a writing income either. Yet. So I’ve always had the freedom of writing what I wanted to write and the uphill battle of trying to interest an agent or an editor in it and selling it.
When you’re making your living as a writer, can you afford to take chances on a novel that may not sell because it’s too far out there?
Isn’t there something to be said for NOT making your living as a writer and NOT being dependent on your writing income to pay for groceries? Maybe those burdens are what kill creativity.
If you’re going to “go for it,” at least be realistic about what may follow.
A Month From Miami
Hidden Assets
Training Tommy
Happily Married?
January 20, 2010 by barbmeyersI’ve just returned from the wedding of two twenty-somethings who, it was intimated by family members, had never kissed each other (or anyone else of the opposite sex for that matter) before the minister told the groom he could kiss his bride.
This is all well and good, I think. Rare and special in this day and age, so certainly worth commenting upon. However, I would hate for anyone to get the impression that purity prior to such a commitment is any guarantee of marital happiness.
I think the words “happily married” should never be used together, mostly because I don’t know anyone who is happily married. I know people who appear to be happy, and some of them are married. But “happily married” implies that you are happy in your marriage and happy to be married to your spouse. In my experience, this is rarely true, no matter what you experienced before you got married.
Being a virgin on your wedding day is no guarantee of anything for your future, except, I suppose, it gives your spouse less of your past to be concerned about. With nothing to compare it to, it might also be hard to find fault with your spouse’s lovemaking technique, either, although dissatisfaction is dissatisfaction no matter which way you slice it.
My own parents were appalled when I decided to marry outside the religious faith I’d been raised in. In their generation and culture, it wasn’t done. My mother converted to marry my father. Somehow they believed a shared religious faith would guarantee or at least strengthen the bond of marriage. I have to look no further than my own family of origin to discover this is simply not true.
What is true is that there are no guarantees for any of us. As my wise father used to say, “You put in your nickel and you take your chances.” If you are still married after twenty or thirty or fifty years, it doesn’t mean you’re happily married. All it really means is that you didn’t get divorced.
As part of the guestbook for this couple we were asked to offer them advice. I had none to offer. Not the wisdom of age and experience. I advised them to muddle through it like the rest of us.
My twenty-something daughter thought I should have more to offer than that. In her opinion I’ve been successfully married for almost thirty years. But does a “successful” relationship translate into a “happy” relationship? It’s a long-term relationship. That doesn’t necessarily make it either successful or happy. Don’t we all know couples who seem miserable with each other but who go on year after year? And no, I’m not implying I’m miserable. Far from it actually.
I think I’m a relatively happy individual, but that’s a choice I make. I guess what I should have advised that young couple is don’t depend on your spouse to make you happy or to keep you happy. If you’re looking for your happiness in another person or even in your most significant adult relationship, I don’t think you’ll find it.
Happiness is something you create for yourself, even in the confines of a less than ideal marriage. You can’t let marriage define who you are and what your outlook is going to be. You have to define those things for yourself. And so does your spouse. Can you enhance another person’s life by being the best you you can be? Of course. But you can’t make someone else happy. And the sooner you realize that, the better off you’ll be.
I think it would be best if we struck “happily married” from our vernacular. I’m happy. I’m also married. But those are two entirely different things.
Tags: happiness, Marriage, relationships
Posted in Life, Marriage, Romance Advice, Social Commentary, Writing Romance | Leave a Comment »