First on my list of disappointments were some of my recent library book selections. I could only read two out of five. One was a Lee Child Jack Reacher novel. The other was Betrayal by John Patrick Hunter. The rejected ones were, in no particular order: an award winning (literary?) novel so bogged down in excessive description I’m not sure a story existed; a historical novel that looked intriguing but again was so bogged down by historical information that had nothing to do with the actual story I gave up. Note to self: beware of historical novels written by British history professors. Number three was a British chick lit(?) book, again, bogged down in a slow- moving set-up and a heroine(?) so depressed and depressing I knew I wouldn’t be able to get interested. Why do British authors take so long to get into the story????
Why do I choose at least five books on each library trip? Because I hope I can get through at least two of them. Sometimes it’s more. Sometimes it’s less.
Now, for the even bigger disappointment: I took a fellow author up on a free ebook offer I saw on Facebook for one of her mystery series books.
I’ve never read this author before and tend to think I won’t again. It appears she indie published this mystery, which I would think would make a professional author even more vigilant about proofreading, but apparently that is not the case in this instance. The misspellings, usage errors and repetitiveness nearly drove me insane. Add to that a heroine who can’t get it through her head (even after the investigating police detective assures her numerous times) that she is a witness and not a suspect. She’s convinced she’ll end up in the slammer facing the death penalty unless she solves the case on her own. It’s like she has a mental block or something. I wanted to smack her.
Many of us are doing indie publishing these days, myself included, with mixed results. I applaud the effort, but I wish the standards were higher, because a book like this makes us look bad. Or I thought it would at least make this particular author look bad. But such is not the case. This book has four plus stars as its average rating on Amazon.com. I wish I could figure out why something I think sucks garners rave reviews. Are these the author’s friends and family posting such positive comments? Or are they readers who honestly thought this was a great book? I wish I knew and I wish I had as many reader fans willing to post wonderful reviews of my books.
I won’t even ask my friends and family to read my books any more or to post reviews for me. If they are inclined to do so on their own (most of them aren’t) that’s great and I appreciate it. But if they don’t like my books, I don’t want them to lie on my behalf. (Actually I do but I would never ask them to!)
I should no longer be surprised by the number of traditionally published books that are essentially about nothing. By page 163 of a recent read I still had no idea what the point of the story was or where it was going. I didn’t care about the main character or anything else. I wish I’d given up on this one much sooner.
I’ve decided the test of a “good” book is how long it takes me to read it. If I can’t wait to pick it up again, if I read to the exclusion of other leisure time activities (and that includes watching Sex and the City or Castle reruns while playing Bejeweled Blitz), then I’ve picked a winner. Sadly, this doesn’t happen often enough.
Visit me at http://www.barbarameyers.com
Follow my infrequent posts on Twitter @barbmeyers and @ajtillock